To say that I am torn in my reactions to Quilting With A Modern Slant is an understatement. Part of me liked the book. A larger part absolutely hates it. But then, that is what ‘Art’ is all about, isn’t it? It reaches out and changes boundaries, pulling reactions, whether good or bad, from the soul and the heart.
Rachel May describes her book this way: Modern quilting allows artists the freedom to play with traditions and take liberties with fabrics, patterns, colors, stitching, and the ways in which they all connect. She then offers works from 70 different modern-day quilters, exploring their take on the subject of modern quilt art.
One of the things I find odd about the premise of the book is its heavy reliance on the art of the Gee’s Bend Quilters as a “modern” concept on quilting. The Gee’s Bend Quilt tradition began in the 19th century, in the Gee’s Bend community of Alabama. A cotton plantation belonging to Joseph Gee was the starting point for a style of geometric and highly improvisational quilt making brought about by the necessity of staying warm in rough, unheated slave shacks. Today, the quilts have been exhibited at the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, the Indianapolis Museum of Art, the Philadelphia Museum of Art, and the Whitney Museum of American Art, among others. In the words of Alvia Wardlaw, the curator of Modern and Contemporary Art at the Museum of Fine Arts, “The compositions of these quilts contrast dramatically with the ordered regularity associated with many styles of Euro-American quilt making. There’s a brilliant, improvisational range of approaches to comphttps://soireadthisbooktoday.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post-new.phposition that is more often associated with the inventiveness and power of the leading 20th-century abstract painters than it is with textile-making.”
First, I must say that the power and beauty of the Gee’s Bend’s Quilts is absolutely breathtaking. There are several books you can read that describe the quilts and their makers. Those listed here are only two of many volumes written over the years.
The quilts are made with what could be obtained in the day, showing the worn knees of work pants and the leftover pieces of dresses so worn as to be nearly indistinguishable in pattern. The careful stitching and clean lines are clear indicators of the care and thought that went into each one. The quilts were designed for use, but also an eye to beauty.
While many of the quilts in the book honour these concepts of improvisation and beauty, clean lines and careful stitches, others, well, others do not. Instead, they seem to rejoice in ugly fabrics, clashing colours, and a jarring lack of beauty in line and concept. Others are so blatantly derivative of the Gee’s Bend Quilts as to be nothing other than copies.
There are good things about the book. The segments on natural dying are quite good, as are the segments on paper piecing and hand quilting. However, all of these are better, and more thoroughly described, in other volumes. I believe what pushes me into the ‘hate’ column with the book, overall, comes back to May’s description of, “What Is Modern Quilting?” In her own words, “Most quilters agree that it has something to do with a sense of experimentation. Modern quilters might take a traditional block or pattern and innovate to turn it into something “fresh.”” And here is my problem. Most of the quilts and concepts in the book are so derivative as to lack any sense of ‘new’ or ‘modern’. Instead, they fall back on ’MidCentury Modern’, that old standby from more than 50 years ago in the 1950’s and still so popular today. Even the fabric patterns are derivative of the 1950s, with some of those ugly, less-than-awe-inspiring 1970’s prints thrown in for good measure. Having started my own quilting journey in the 1970’s, I know all about ugly fabrics!
While some of the artists seem to have given great consideration to beauty, colour, line, and simplicity, or with a message, (Denyse Schmidt, Denise Burge) others seem to define the concept of “Modern” as grabbing the ugliest fabrics in their rag bag and stitching them together with no thought for any of these concepts of design (names withheld to protect the innocent. Or my possible lack of artistic eye, whichever.)
When it comes right down to it, if you are a fan of Gee’s Bend Quilts, you may or may not like this book. I love the originals; I am not so taken with most of the work in this book. There are some brilliant high-points in the book, such as when Nancy Crow talks about the quilts of Anna Williams, an elderly, illiterate quilters from Louisiana whose work, completed without patterns or rulers, shows absolute lyrical brilliance in her work. All in all, this is definitely a book you should glance through before making a decision. Maybe my discomfort with the book is the fact that I am not a fan of the “Modern Art Movement” or “Deconstructivism. I have quite wide ranging tastes, but my favorites are works by artists such as Diane Millsap or Jos Coufreur.
This just doesn’t do it for me. Before you ask, I have widely diverse tastes in the works of quilters. Everything from the busy, ‘folk ‘ stylings of Susan Shie pieces to the meticulous Baltimore Album style of wonderful quilters like the often unacknowledged quilters who made complex appliqued Baltimore Album Quilts such as this one, in the Maryland Historical Society Collection. My personal favorites lean toward brilliant colour and intense quilting, such as anything at all by Jacqueline de Jonge. It’s all a matter of taste.
Overall, in my opinion, this book is recommended to some, not to others. Look before you buy.
I received my copy of the book from Storey Publishing in return for an honest review.
All opinions are my own, all artworks are the property of the artists.